Assistant Village Idiot: Jumping To Conclusions - Alfred C. Kinsey

Assistant Village Idiot: Jumping To Conclusions - Alfred C. Kinsey: I leapt to a conclusion in preparation for another post, and thought my few readers might be interested not only in the case, but my interna...

Alfred Kinsey is guilty of academic dishonesty. #TellSomebody

Kinsey was legitimised through academia, but this man was a pervert himself, Kinsey and his junk science has damaged western society, it was real dirty deal utimately a con.

Kinsey:was the leading scientific expert on human sexuality.

** LOL and gives side eyes**

Yep, that what this mad scientist is thought off as, Kinsey, the same cretin that used data from peadophiles raping and molesting children to create Table 34 to state that children were actively sexual from birth, not even that cocaine-taking baffoon that is Sigmund Freud/Fraud (father of psychotherapy, my ass) believed that rather Sigmund Freud/Fraud believed children sexuality  was latent, until puberty.

If people knew that Kinsey worked with a Nazi paedophile and encouraged his rapes of children and possibly the murder of a little girl would he still be lauded as a pioneer of human sexuality?  The Mad Scientist that was Kinsey was responsible for the decriminalisation of every single law that protected women and children.

Kinsey falsely claimed that children were orgasmic from birth and can benefit from sex with adults and incest, part of Kinsey defence of peadophiles was that he believed that children were not really harmed by sexual contact with adults therefore it made no sense to incarcerate peadophiles for lengthly prison sentence ( ever wondered why peadophiles always got slap on the wrist, mickey mouse, namby -pamby sentences)

The Kinsey Institute are paedophile enablers.

CUI BONO?  Who benefits

Why does no body/society in general  ask ‘who benefits’, when  people make claims that children are prime for raping, buggering and molesting , that it does no damage, and peadophiles are people who are still safe.

Why does no body/society in general asks ‘who benefits’ when we do not nationwide Megan’s Law in the United Kingdom? And why the government is just giving lip service to Megan Law and dragging it’s feet to implement it.

Why does no body/society in general  ask ‘who benefits’ when sex – offenders are able to remove they names from the sex offenders register after 5 years.

I’m quite the leftist and I cannot stand Ben Sarpiro he is homophobic and transphobic, I do not like the way he is trying to infer that homosexuality is the same as incest. No one is a bigot for recoiling from and hating incest how can you call it incestphobia  moral relativism at its finest.

#TellSomebody

Thoughts don't become reality.

http://www.elephantjournal.com/2015/11/thoughts-dont-become-realityunderstanding-the-law-of-attraction/